top of page

New EIB report: EU Municipalities ill-equipped to Deal with Digital and Climate Challenges



Europe’s COVID-19 recovery strategy calls for large-scale public investment to “build back better.” Local authorities, such as municipalities, account for 45% of all public investment, making them a key partner in recovery efforts. As poles of social and economic activities, municipalities will also be critical to addressing climate change and improving digitalisation. In this context, a new EIB report, “The state of local infrastructure investment in Europe: EIB Municipalities Survey 2020”, published on 2 August 2021, examines how municipal investment priorities in the EU are evolving. The report shows a clear desire by municipalities to increase investment for climate change adaption and mitigation as well as digitalisation.


The report is based on a unique survey of almost 700 municipalities in the European Union conducted during the summer of 2020. The results show that following a long barren spell after the global financial and European sovereign debt crisis, investment by EU municipalities had started to pick up. However, investment gaps remain while the twin — digital and green — transition is adding new ones. In response to COVID-19, municipalities are looking to refocus investment towards digital and social infrastructure. In addition to a lack of funding, regulatory red tape and limited technical capacities impede investment in climate action and digitalisation.


Most EU municipalities are telling us that their investment remains inadequate. One of the main barriers holding back such investment are technical and planning capacities. Many municipalities are ill-equipped to master the climate and digital transition challenges,” said EIB Chief Economist Debora Revoltella. “To meet its goals, Europe must help municipalities develop the capacities necessary to deal with climate change and to promote digitalisation. The good news is that municipalities, particularly those in less-developed regions, are eager to catch up.”


Investment activity of EU municipalities


Pre-COVID-19, municipal infrastructure investment had been picking up. In the three years leading up to the pandemic in 2020, nearly two-thirds of EU municipalities had increased infrastructure investment, reversing a decade of fiscal austerity. The highest increases were for digital and social infrastructure as well as climate change mitigation. There are regional differences, however. Increased investment notwithstanding, the majority of EU municipalities considered infrastructure investment lacking, especially for digitalisation, and climate change mitigation and adaptation, as well as urban transport.


The impact of COVID-19


By the summer of 2020, one-third of municipalities already anticipated changing their investment plans due to COVID-19. In doing so, their priorities shifted towards digital and social infrastructure. Municipalities in Southern Europe were particularly inclined to perceive a need to increase investment, notably in social infrastructure (31%), and in digital infrastructure (38%). At the same time, almost 80% of EU municipalities consider a lack of funding as an impediment to investment.


Based on the EIB report, ECOPNET (European Cooperation and Partnership Network) points out sizable gaps between different European regions. Southern Europe, which was still suffering after the financial crisis, continued to hold back on spending. By contrast, nearly three-quarters of municipalities in the rest of Europe increased infrastructure investment.

Administrative capacity: Green lags behind digital


Taking on the twin challenge of the green and digital transitions requires adequate administrative capacity. While there are plans for further development, the majority of municipalities exhibited gaps: nearly two-thirds report a lack of green administrative capacity (such as green budgeting) and nearly half for digital (such as provision of digital government services).


Regional differences matter, with Western and Northern Europe leading, and Southern Europe lagging behind in green, in particular, whereas Central and Eastern Europe lags behind on digital sophistication. Both regions have designs on catching up in these areas.




Source: European Investment Bank Newsroom




Comentários


bottom of page